naturalsearchblog.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the naturalsearchblog.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host naturalsearchblog.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is WebsiteWelcome.com .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx/1.14.0 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

natural search blog categories archive about contact welcome to natural search blog natural search blog provides articles on search engine optimization including keyword reasearch, on-page factors, link-building, social media optimization, local search optimization, image search optimization, and mobile seo. in addition to natural search optimization topics, we also cover internet marketing, ecommerce, web design, usability, and technology. recent entries reach local scam artists & thwack ‘em! have you ever been taken advantage of by a business, and wanted to get your due justice? in most cases we may encounter generally bad service or unacceptable products from small businesses. but, in the worst cases, we actually get victimized by our friendly, local scam artists . it’s not just a matter of unsatisfactory service, but they willfully intended to dupe or cheat your or treat you badly! with merely a bad service or product, we might push for a discount or refund, and write some negative reviews about a company at various ratings sites like yelp. but, when it’s an actual scam artist, it becomes a question of how to reach them in the first place, and then how to do anything that they’d even feel. in the local search marketing world, many of us have noticed a spate of bad actors who are setting up fraudulent business listings (perhaps even operating under bogus names), and once they’ve lured people into doing business with them, they abscond with fees in return for shoddy service or no service/product whatsoever. so, there are some basic issues around how they are operating with impunity, promoting themselves online (sometimes out-ranking bona fide established local businesses), and then taking consumers’ money with zero accountability. so, here are some tips we’ve made to help you reach local scam artists and even thwack ’em! you may not be able to get your lost time and money back, but you may get a little justice or you might be able to declaw these bad guys just a bit so they can’t prey on other consumers as easily. tips to reach local scam artists & thwack ‘em : (more…) possible related posts posted by chris of silvery on 05/05/2011 permalink | email this post | print | trackback | comments (0) | comments rss filed under: best practices , general , google , reference material , security , worst practices complaints , con men , consumer complaints , reach local , reach local complaints , reach local scams , reachlocal , reachlocal scams , scam artists , scams supermedia + dex one = superdex i was recently speculating about a possible supermedia – dex one merger which could be hinted-at by the two companies cross-distribution agreement . if the two companies do merge, what might be their combined product or company brand name? here’s a portmanteau brandname logo i came up with: + = actually, i since discovered that “superdex” is the trademarked name of a chromatography product, so that potential brand name is in-use and not available! perhaps some other brand name could result from the theoretic union of yellow pages companies, like “superknows” or “dexmedia”. maybe even “dexpages” or “superone”! it would probably be ultimately least expensive to keep one dominant brand name — i think superpages has more brand equity overall, so that’s what i would vote towards. possible related posts posted by chris of silvery on 09/10/2010 permalink | email this post | print | trackback | comments (0) | comments rss filed under: brand names , domain names , yellow pages brand names , brand naming , brandnames , dex one , dexknows , directories , directory , internet-yellow-pages , iyp , logo design , logos , mergers , supermedia , superpages , yellow pages texas stadium demolition case study – youtube still tops for video promotion whenever i know i’ll be near some major spectacle, i try to photograph it or video it. not only are such events great practice for a search marketer, the content is great for getting links from individuals and from newspapers. so, when i heard about the scheduled texas stadium demolition, i couldn’t resist, even though it was painfully early in the morning (7:00 a.m.). i’ve written here before on how flickr introduced videos in order to compete with the popular youtube. flickr’s owned by yahoo, while google owns youtube. both services have a huge usership, however, (more…) possible related posts posted by chris of silvery on 04/11/2010 permalink | email this post | print | trackback | comments (0) | comments rss filed under: image optimization , seo , video optimization dallas cowboys , flickr , image seo , image-search , texas stadium , video search , video seo , videos , youtube top in-house seos – where are they now? there’s been a lot of buzz lately criticizing topseos , a business which purports to rate search engine optimization experts, though ratings are influenced by payments. both aaron wall and edward lewis skewered the service with pretty convincing points. the rating service and talk about it reminded me that i actually did a sort of rating via a blog post here back in 2007 entitled “ some top in-house seos “. in that post i sought to list out the cream-of-the-crop of search engine optimization experts working within major companies. the main difficulty of attempting to rate seos is that it’s quite hard to know precisely what they’ve recommended or done to optimize a company’s websites. for instance, you could be an absolute genius at seo, but if the company is lethargic or incompetent programmers oversee their sites, none of the seo expert’s talent might be reflected in the actual site. that’s an extreme example, and in most cases some degree of the expert’s recommendations will be properly implemented. but the point is that site configuration may not really be used to reflect an expert’s actual ability, particularly if compared with other colleagues. back when i wrote “some top in-house seos”, i wasn’t really prepared for the large amount of attention it received. i was immediately pressured by a lot of people who wanted to be added to the list, but didn’t meet the criteria i was using. quite a few people asked me to update the list over time as well, and i quickly saw that it would be necessary if this was done ongoing to be open about the rating criteria i was using — else people would question why so-and-so was listed while so-and-so was not. the criteria i used back then was very basic. i wanted to list only people who were employees of top companies that performed organic search optimization of one sort or another for those company’s websites. i wanted companies which were readily-identifiable by a majority of people in the u.s., so they had to be major brand names: top-50 websites, fortune 500 companies, and internet retailer 500 companies. finally, i had to be able to find/identify the seos who worked for those companies, which usually meant that they’d have to self-disclose what they did (many seos operated somewhat anonymously behind corporate walls). so, the seo needed to blog or speak at conferences, and disclose who they worked for. in one or two cases, i discovered individual’s names through news interviews or press releases. i also mined the list of top-linked seos from linkedin (apparently no longer in operation? formerly: http://www.linkedseo.com/). i made a number of mistakes, of course. i didn’t feel i had time to write to and receive confirmation from each person. in some cases i just “outed” people from behind the corporate curtain for the first time! for the most part, people loved the attention and recognition! i felt a bit stressed from those who clamored to get in, and i pretty much stated that i wouldn’t add any until i updated a year down the road. in quite a lot of cases, i think that headhunters mined the list in order to lure people away to other companies, so many benefited from the exposure. here it is, about three years after the fact, and i thought it’d be interesting to see where

URL analysis for naturalsearchblog.com

http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/tag/reachlocal/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/tag/skywriting/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/tag/con-men/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/tag/increased-keyword-targeting/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/category/html-optimization/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/category/research-and-development/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/category/marketing/feed/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/tag/local-search/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2010/01/12/exciting-news-netconcepts-acquired-by-covario/#respond
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/tag/seo-superhero/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/2010/04/11/texas-stadium-demolition-case-study-youtube-video-seo/feed/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/tag/in-house/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/category/tricks/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/category/keyword-research/feed/
http://www.naturalsearchblog.com/archives/category/best-practices/feed/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: NATURALSEARCHBLOG.COM
Registry Domain ID: 134145070_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.moniker.com
Registrar URL: http://www.moniker.com
Updated Date: 2018-07-14T09:36:29Z
Creation Date: 2004-11-02T02:57:48Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-11-02T01:57:48Z
Registrar: Moniker Online Services LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 228
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +49.68949396850
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Name Server: NS1.MONIKERDNS.NET
Name Server: NS2.MONIKERDNS.NET
Name Server: NS3.MONIKERDNS.NET
Name Server: NS4.MONIKERDNS.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2019-08-10T19:36:56Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR Moniker Online Services LLC

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =naturalsearchblog.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME naturalsearchblog.com

  CHANGED 2018-07-14

  CREATED 2004-11-02

STATUS
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited

NSERVER

  NS1.MONIKERDNS.NET 198.50.155.119

  NS2.MONIKERDNS.NET 167.114.35.25

  NS3.MONIKERDNS.NET 192.95.55.201

  NS4.MONIKERDNS.NET 192.99.185.221

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .